Warning: Constant FS_CHMOD_DIR already defined in /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-config.php on line 93

Warning: Constant FS_CHMOD_FILE already defined in /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-config.php on line 93

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-config.php:93) in /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-config.php:93) in /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-config.php:93) in /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-config.php:93) in /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-config.php:93) in /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-config.php:93) in /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-config.php:93) in /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-config.php:93) in /home/beauvoir/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831
{"id":392,"date":"2019-03-12T13:28:09","date_gmt":"2019-03-12T18:28:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/beauvoirveteranproject.org\/?p=392"},"modified":"2019-03-25T18:19:12","modified_gmt":"2019-03-25T23:19:12","slug":"the-unusual-case-of-james-burney-nathan-best-and-frank-childress","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/beauvoirveteranproject.org\/uc\/the-unusual-case-of-james-burney-nathan-best-and-frank-childress\/","title":{"rendered":"The Unusual Case of James Burney, Nathan Best, and Frank Childress"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Three\nAfrican-American Residents at Beauvoir: <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The\nUnusual Case of James Burney, Nathan Best, and Frank Childress<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[This essay \u2014 revised for length \u2014 was taken from the article by Susannah J. Ural, \u201c\u201c<\/g>Every Comfort, Freedom and<\/g> Liberty\u201d: A Case Study of Mississippi\u2019s Confederate Home,\u201d The Journal of the Civil War Era<\/a> 9 (March 2019), 55-83.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"

athan Best and Frank Childress, former Confederate body servants, Confederate pensioners, and residents of Beauvoir. Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College Dixie Press Collection <\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

In the early 1930s, three aging, impoverished men entered the Jefferson Davis Soldiers\u2019 Home in Biloxi, Mississippi. The facility, commonly known as Beauvoir, was Mississippi\u2019s state home for destitute Confederate veterans and their wives or widows. Two of the men, Frank Childress and Nathan Best, bore clear signs of their wartime injuries. Childress suffered, he reported, from a \u201csore leg caused by a gunshot wound received during service in 1861.\u201d Nathan Best\u2019s empty sleeve spoke to his injury and amputation during the Petersburg Campaign. None of this made these men exceptional cases among Beauvoir residents except for one key factor. All three men \u2014 Childress, Best, and James Burney \u2014 had been enslaved Confederate body servants during the Civil War. This had made them eligible for a Mississippi Confederate pension funded by the state, and it also granted them access, or at the very least, consideration for access, to Beauvoir. They were also exceptional as the only African-American pensioners that the Beauvoir Veteran Project research team has been able to find living as residents <\/em>(not employees) of a Confederate home.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Their\nadmission was the result of an unusual pension policy that began in Mississippi\nin the late 1880s. When state legislators created the Mississippi\u2019s Confederate\npension policy in 1888, it provided modest financial support to Confederate\nveterans and their widows who had not remarried, as well as \u201cthe servants of\nthe officers, soldiers and sailors of the late Confederate States of America,\nwho enlisted from the State of Mississippi.\u201d[1]<\/a>\nIt was not until the 1920s that five other states passed variations of this\npolicy, joining Mississippi in providing pensions for formerly enslaved Confederate\nmilitary \u201cservants\u201d or, in other states, laborers. Beyond being early, Mississippi\u2019s\npolicy was unique because legislators decided to pay African-American and white\npensioners at the same rate. When Mississippi\u2019s 1890 Constitution\nomitted reference to pensions for \u201cservants,\u201d state legislators took the time\nto clarify in 1896 that formerly enslaved men who had served Confederate\nsoldiers could still receive state support. Legislators then took an even more\nunusual step in the Jim Crow South by insisting that veterans, widows, and\n\u201cservants\u201d would \u201cshare and share alike\u201d from the state\u2019s pension fund.[2]<\/a>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They\ndid this because in the eyes of white elites, many of whom were former slave\nowners, it allowed them to aid formerly enslaved men who had served the\nConfederate military effort in ways that whites saw as acceptable \u2014 as camp servants\nrather than as armed combatants.[3]<\/a>\n Indeed, if Mississippi failed to do\nthis, they fed the North\u2019s narrative of the war. As one Mississippi editor\nexplained, if Mississippi ignored such service, it \u201cwould mean that while\nnegroes who rendered any military service for the Yankees are handsomely\npensioned, those who served their masters in war adopted an evil policy and\nshould be condemned.\u201d Pensions for Confederate \u201cservants\u201d helped sustain the\nimage of \u201cloyal slaves\u201d and similar aspects the Lost Cause memory of the war. [4]<\/a>\nThis argument swayed leading Mississippians until 1922, when a new generation rejected\nthe idea of equal pensions regardless of race.[5]<\/a>\nBut this state endorsement was sufficient to warrant Frank Childress, James Burney,\nand Nathan Best the opportunity to apply for and gain admission as residents of\nBeauvoir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In August 1930, a Harrison County pension board reviewed James Burney\u2019s claim that he had served as Confederate President Jefferson Davis\u2019s \u201cbody guard<\/g>\u201d in the final years of the war. To receive a Confederate pension, the state of Mississippi required black applicants, like whites, to demonstrate that they had not deserted service and that they were residents of the state. They also had to secure two white witnesses to verify their claims. These witnesses were required in all pension applications, but in the case of black applicants, Confederate military records \u2014 the source used to verify white pension claims \u2014 rarely noted the names of enslaved body servants. Some men also received additional endorsements from their employers (see, for example, the hand written<\/g> note<\/g> in Burney\u2019s pension<\/a> application). As a result, this testimony of white witnesses also ensured that openly rebellious African-American men \u2014 those resisting Jim Crow injustices, for example \u2014 were unlikely to receive a Confederate servant\u2019s pension.[6]<\/a> A Harrison County pension board approved James Burney\u2019s application in September 1930, but it appears that those pension funds were not enough to sustain him independently. He applied for residence at the Jefferson Davis Soldiers\u2019 Home and entered Beauvoir two years later at the age of ninety-nine. Burney died there seven months later on March 11, 1933, and Beauvoir shipped his body home to family in Vancleave, Mississippi, for burial.[7]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In August 1932, Frank Childress applied<\/a> for a Confederate pension in Tunica County, Mississippi, where he explained that he had been a body servant to Colonel Mark Childress and suffered an 1861 gunshot wound to his leg. [insert image of Frank Childress pension app] The board approved his application in September 1932, but, like Burney, those funds, reduced on the grounds of race, were not sufficient to sustain Childress. He applied for residency at Beauvoir and arrived at the Jefferson Davis Soldiers\u2019 Home in July 1934. A lack of sources prevents our knowing why Childress moved when he did, but he likely was motivated for the same reasons as many of the residents: at Beauvoir<\/g> the aging pensioner would receive better care than he could provide for himself on a small pension. Frank Childress lived at the home for only two years; he received an honorable discharge on December 28, 1936.[8]<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Much more is known about the third African-American resident of Beauvoir, Nathan Best. [9]<\/a> He entered the home with James Burney in August 1932, and later lived with Frank Childress. Childress and Best received the same $2 allowance as other residents, but their clothing allotment was less than that of white residents and their cabin was segregated from the cottage-like dormitories that housed white veterans, wives, and widows. Best explained, in the words of a 1930s Works Progress Administrative (WPA) interviewer, how he lived on this meager support: \u201cI raises<\/g> a garden an\u2019 sells de stuff, I used to sell de bigge<\/g>\u2019 part of it right here at de Home. Dey gives us $2.00 a month spendin\u2019 oney<\/g> now, I doan<\/g> know what dey<\/g> gwine<\/g> to do, dey talks about quittin\u2019 dat<\/g>.\u201d His concerns may have been tied to Mississippi\u2019s massive reduction in funding for state agencies during the Great Depression. Between 1932 and 1934, legislators cut Beauvoir\u2019s budget by twenty-five percent, and residents\u2019 monthly allowances dropped from $5 to $2. These payments were created to give residents pocket change and a sense of independence, in part because they relinquished their pension in exchange for their care when they entered the home.[10]<\/a> Best may have worried that state leaders would reduce or abolish allowances for Beauvoir\u2019s black residents, just as they had reduced black pension rates. But Nathan Best did not elaborate on this issue, or it was not recorded if he did, while he chatted with the WPA interviewer in front of his Beauvoir cabin.[11]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n